How to Start a Construction Company: A Step-By-Step Guide

Defining Oppression and Mismanagement

The Companies Act, 2013, does not explicitly define oppression and mismanagement. Instead, their meanings have evolved through judicial interpretations and case law.

In simple terms:

• Oppression involves burdensome, harsh, or wrongful conduct toward minority shareholders. It typically refers to situations where the majority shareholders abuse their power to harm the minority's rights or interests.
  
  
• Mismanagement refers to gross mismanagement of company affairs, which could lead to financial loss or harm to the company’s reputation or operations. It often involves negligence, fraud, or actions taken in bad faith by those in control.

Legal Remedies under Sections 241–246

Sections 241 to 246 of the Companies Act, 2013 empower company members to approach the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) if they believe the company’s affairs are being conducted in a manner that amounts to oppression or mismanagement.

If the tribunal is satisfied, it can order remedies such as:

• Regulation of the company’s future conduct
• Removal of directors
• Termination, modification, or setting aside of certain agreements
• Recovery of misappropriated funds
• Preventive actions to safeguard the company’s interests

A Detailed Explanation of Section 241

Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013 is the core provision that allows members to seek relief from oppression and mismanagement.

Section 241 exists to protect minority shareholders and the company itself from conduct that threatens their interests. It ensures that no shareholder or director misuses their powers to the detriment of others or the company.

Under Section 241, a member can apply to the NCLT if:

• The company’s affairs are being conducted in a manner oppressive to any member(s).
• There has been mismanagement that threatens to cause serious prejudice to the interests of the company, members, or the public.

How can an Application be made under Section 241?

Filing an application under Section 241 involves a specific legal process:

Who Can Apply?

Eligible members include:

• Shareholders holding at least 10% of the company’s issued share capital
• In companies without share capital, at least 1/5th of the total number of members
  In certain cases, members may request NCLT permission to file even if they do not meet the above thresholds (especially where the majority is acting in bad faith).

Grounds for Filing

The application must clearly describe:

• Acts of oppression (specific conduct harming member rights)
• Acts of mismanagement (negligence, fraud, misconduct, etc.)
• Resulting harm to the company or its members

Documentation Required

• Petition/application under Section 241
• Evidence of shareholding or membership eligibility
• Documentary proof of oppressive/mismanaged conduct
• Affidavit verifying the facts
• Court fees as prescribed

Where to File?

Applications must be filed with the relevant bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) having jurisdiction over the company’s registered office.

{{company-reg-cta}}

Who Can File an Application under Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013?

Eligibility to file under Section 241 depends on the applicant’s status and shareholding:

In addition, the Central Government can also apply under Section 241(2) if it believes the affairs of the company are conducted in a manner prejudicial to public interest.

Frequently Asked Questions

Understanding Auditor as Per Companies Act 2013

Under the Companies Act, 2013, an auditor is defined as a qualified professional appointed to examine and verify a company's financial statements and records. According to Section 139 of the Act, only an individual Chartered Accountant or a firm of Chartered Accountants registered under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, can be appointed as an auditor of a company. If the auditor is a firm, including a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), the majority of its partners practicing in India must be qualified Chartered Accountants.

The Act emphasizes the importance of auditor independence to ensure unbiased examination of financial records. An auditor must remain free from any financial interest in the company being audited and cannot have business relationships that might compromise their objectivity. This independence requirement is fundamental to maintaining the integrity of the audit process and ensuring that stakeholders receive reliable financial information.

The qualification criteria are stringent to ensure that only professionals with appropriate expertise and ethical standards undertake this crucial responsibility. The Companies Act specifically disqualifies certain individuals from being appointed as auditors, including employees of the company, those indebted to the company beyond a specified limit, and those holding securities in the company or its subsidiaries.

Role of an Auditor under Companies Act

An auditor performs several vital functions within the corporate governance framework as prescribed by the Companies Act, 2013. Their primary role includes:

• Examining the company's financial statements to ensure they provide a true and fair view of the financial position and performance.
  
• Verifying that proper books of account have been maintained by the company as required by law
  
• Assessing the effectiveness of internal financial controls and reporting any weaknesses
  
• Reporting instances of fraud, non-compliance with laws and regulations, or other material weaknesses observed during the audit process
  
• Ensuring that financial statements comply with accounting standards and relevant statutory requirements
  
• Providing an independent opinion on the financial health of the company to protect shareholder interests
  

The auditor's role extends beyond mere number checking; they serve as watchdogs who safeguard stakeholder interests by providing an objective assessment of the company's financial reporting. This independent oversight is crucial for maintaining transparency and building trust among investors, creditors, and other stakeholders.

Appointment of Auditor According to Companies Act, 2013

Section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013 outlines the comprehensive framework for the appointment of auditors. The process begins with the first auditor appointment, which must be completed by the Board of Directors within 30 days from the date of registration of the company. If the Board fails to appoint the first auditor within this timeframe, company members must make the appointment at an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) within 90 days.

The first auditor holds office until the conclusion of the company's first Annual General Meeting (AGM). At this first AGM, a subsequent auditor is appointed who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting until the conclusion of the sixth AGM. This effectively establishes a tenure of five consecutive years for the auditor appointment.

Before finalizing the appointment, companies must obtain written consent from the proposed auditor, along with a certificate stating that the appointment meets all conditions prescribed under the Act. Additionally, the company must inform the appointed auditor of their appointment and file the appropriate notice with the Registrar of Companies within 15 days of the meeting where the appointment was made.

{{company-reg-cta}}

Purpose of Appointment of Auditor

The appointment of a company auditor serves several critical purposes within the corporate governance framework. Primarily, auditors protect the interests of shareholders by providing an independent assessment of the company's financial position. They act as vigilant gatekeepers who examine the accounts maintained by directors and report on the company's true financial condition.

Independent auditors provide assurance to stakeholders that the financial statements presented by management accurately reflect the company's financial position and performance. This third-party verification builds confidence among investors, lenders, and regulatory authorities in the reliability of financial reporting.

Additionally, auditor appointments fulfill statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 2013, helping businesses maintain legal compliance. The audit process identifies potential areas of financial risk, inefficiency, or non-compliance, allowing management to address these issues proactively. Through their objective assessment, auditors contribute significantly to improved financial discipline and transparency, which ultimately strengthens corporate governance practices.

Documents Required for Auditors Appointment

For the proper appointment of an auditor, companies must ensure they have the following essential documents:

• Written consent from the proposed auditor agreeing to the appointment
  
• A certificate from the auditor confirming eligibility and compliance with all conditions specified under the Companies Act, 2013
• Board resolution recommending the auditor's appointment to shareholders
  
• Shareholder resolution approving the appointment of the auditor
  
• Form ADT-1 for filing notice of appointment with the Registrar of Companies
  
• Copy of the auditor's Chartered Accountant certification and practice certificate
  
• Declaration of independence from the auditor confirming no conflicts of interest
  
• Letter of engagement outlining the terms of the audit assignment and responsibilities
  

Procedure for the Appointment of Auditor

Eligibility Verification

The appointment process begins with verifying the eligibility of the proposed auditor. Only a practicing Chartered Accountant or a firm of Chartered Accountants can be appointed as an auditor. The company must ensure the auditor doesn't fall under any disqualification criteria specified in Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Obtaining Consent and Certificate

Before appointment, the company must obtain written consent from the proposed auditor. Additionally, the auditor must provide a certificate stating that the appointment complies with all conditions prescribed under the Act and Rules. This certificate should confirm that the auditor meets independence requirements and has no conflicts of interest that might compromise audit objectivity.

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors reviews the qualifications and credentials of potential auditors and passes a resolution recommending suitable candidates to shareholders. For the first auditor, the Board directly makes the appointment within 30 days of company registration.

Shareholder Approval

For subsequent auditors, the appointment requires approval from shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. The company includes the auditor appointment as an agenda item in the AGM notice, and shareholders vote on the resolution.

Filing Requirements

After appointment, the company must file Form ADT-1 with the Registrar of Companies within 15 days of the meeting where the appointment was made. This filing formally notifies regulatory authorities about the auditor appointment and includes details about the auditor's term and remuneration.

Communication to Auditor

The company must formally communicate the appointment to the auditor, specifying the tenure and terms of engagement. This communication establishes the official relationship between the company and its auditor for the designated period.

Guidelines for Appointment of Auditor for Different Types of Companies

The appointment process varies depending on the company type, as outlined below:

Changing the Auditor: Special Notice Requirements Under Companies Act

The Companies Act, 2013 establishes specific procedures when changing auditors to ensure transparency and protect auditor independence. A special notice is required in the following circumstances:

• When appointing someone other than the retiring auditor
  
• When explicitly deciding not to reappoint a retiring auditor
  
• When removing an auditor before the expiration of their term
  

The special notice requirement involves:

• Providing notice to the company at least 14 days before the general meeting
  
• The company must immediately forward a copy of this notice to the affected auditor
  
• The auditor has the right to make written representations to the company, which must be circulated to members
  
• The auditor is entitled to be heard at the meeting where the resolution is being considered
  

These provisions ensure that auditor changes are properly scrutinized and that auditors have an opportunity to address any concerns regarding their removal or non-reappointment. This process safeguards against arbitrary dismissals of auditors who may have discovered irregularities or disagreed with management on accounting treatments.

Rotation of an Auditor

The Companies Act, 2013 introduced mandatory auditor rotation to enhance auditor independence and audit quality. This requirement primarily applies to listed companies and certain classes of companies as specified under Section 139(2).

For individual auditors, the maximum term is one period of five consecutive years. For audit firms, the maximum term is two periods of five consecutive years each (totaling ten years). After completing the maximum term, there must be a cooling-off period of five years before the same auditor or audit firm can be reappointed.

Key aspects of auditor rotation include:

• Promotes auditor independence by preventing long-term relationships that might compromise objectivity
  
• Brings fresh perspectives to the audit process, potentially uncovering issues missed by previous auditors
  
• Enhances investor confidence in the integrity of financial statements
  
• Reduces the risk of familiarity threats between auditor and client
  

Companies must plan transitions carefully to ensure smooth handovers between outgoing and incoming auditors, maintaining audit quality throughout the process.

Re-Appointment of Retiring Auditor

A retiring auditor may be re-appointed at the Annual General Meeting provided:

• They are not disqualified for re-appointment under Section 141 of the Act
  
• They have not completed the maximum term allowed under rotation requirements
  
• They have not given notice in writing of their unwillingness to be re-appointed
  
• No special resolution has been passed appointing someone else or specifically providing that the retiring auditor shall not be re-appointed
  

The process for re-appointment typically involves:

• Board recommendation for re-appointment of the retiring auditor
  
• Obtaining fresh written consent and eligibility certificate from the auditor
  
• Placing the re-appointment resolution before shareholders at the AGM
  
• Filing the necessary forms with the Registrar after shareholder approval
  

It's important to note that the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 removed the requirement for annual ratification of auditor appointment by members at every AGM when the auditor is appointed for a five-year term.

Removal, Resignation and Replacement of an Auditor

The Companies Act provides specific provisions for handling auditor changes during their term:

• Removal before term completion: Requires special notice, Central Government approval, and a special resolution at a general meeting. The auditor must be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
  
• Resignation: An auditor may resign by filing Form ADT-3 with the company and the Registrar, stating reasons for resignation. For listed companies and certain other categories, the auditor must also file with the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
  
• Casual vacancy: If a vacancy arises due to resignation, the Board of Directors must fill it within 30 days. If the vacancy is due to any other reason, the Board fills it within 30 days, but the appointment must be approved by members at a general meeting within three months.
  
• Replacement procedure: When replacing an auditor, companies must follow due process including obtaining no objection certificates from the outgoing auditor and ensuring proper handover of relevant audit documents.
  

These provisions ensure that auditor changes are transparent, properly documented, and comply with regulatory requirements to maintain audit integrity and independence.

Conclusion

The appointment of an auditor represents a critical aspect of corporate governance under the Companies Act, 2013. By following the prescribed procedures for appointment, rotation, re-appointment, and removal, companies ensure compliance with legal requirements while strengthening financial transparency and accountability. The structured approach to auditor appointments-with specific provisions for different types of companies-helps maintain the independence and effectiveness of the audit function. Businesses must stay informed about these requirements and any legislative updates to ensure proper audit practices, as non-compliance can lead to penalties and reputational damage. Ultimately, a properly appointed independent auditor serves as a safeguard for stakeholder interests and contributes significantly to the overall integrity of corporate financial reporting.

Frequently Asked Questions

Company is a Separate Legal Entity

A company is recognised as a separate legal entity, distinct from its shareholders. Even if it is fully owned by a single person or a group, the company maintains its independent status. This distinction ensures the company can continue existing regardless of changes in ownership.

However, while a company has legal recognition, it is not considered a citizen and cannot claim fundamental rights granted to individuals.

Example

Suppose John and Mary start a bakery and register it as a private limited company (e.g., "Sweet Treats Pvt. Ltd."). The company can enter into contracts, own property, and sue or be sued in its own name. If the company faces a lawsuit, John and Mary’s personal assets are protected, and only the company’s assets are at risk

Corporate Taxation

As a separate legal entity, a company is taxed independently from its owners. Corporate tax rates vary based on the type of company, its turnover, and prevailing tax laws. This separation ensures that individual shareholders are not personally liable for the company's tax obligations, reinforcing financial security and stability.

Example

Tech Innovators Pvt. Ltd." earns ₹2 crores in a financial year. The company pays corporate tax at the applicable rate (e.g., 25% for companies with turnover up to ₹400 crore), separate from the personal income tax liabilities of its shareholders. The shareholders are not personally liable for the company’s tax dues.

{{company-reg-cta}}

Limited Liability

Limited liability protects shareholders by restricting their financial responsibility to the amount they have invested in the company. This means that even if the company faces financial losses or legal claims, the personal assets of shareholders remain secure. This feature makes private limited companies an attractive option for entrepreneurs and investors.

Example

If "Green Energy Pvt. Ltd." takes a loan and fails to repay it, the shareholders are only liable up to the amount unpaid on their shares. Their personal assets, such as their homes or personal savings, cannot be used to settle the company’s debts.

Company has Transferability of Shares

Shares in a company can be transferred freely unless restricted by the company's articles of association. This feature enhances liquidity, allowing investors to buy or sell shares easily.

While shares of public companies are freely transferable, private companies may impose certain restrictions on share transfers to maintain control over ownership.

Example

A shareholder in "Family Foods Pvt. Ltd." wants to transfer shares to her son. She can do so, provided the company’s Articles of Association allow it and the required approvals are obtained. This enables her to pass on ownership without affecting the company’s existence.

Company is a Juristic Person

Under the Companies Act, a company is considered a juristic person, meaning it has legal rights and obligations similar to a natural person. However, an authorised individual must represent it in legal matters, usually a Board of Directors or a specifically empowered Director.

While a company can file lawsuits, it cannot take an oath or serve as a witness in court, as these actions require a natural person.

Example

"Urban Developers Pvt. Ltd." can purchase land, enter into contracts, and hire employees in its own name. It is treated as a legal person, distinct from its shareholders, and can enforce its rights in court through an authorized representative.

Kickstart Your Business Journey Today!

Register your company hassle-free with Razorpay Rize and get expert guidance every step of the way.

Company has Perpetual Succession

A company's existence is independent of changes in ownership or shareholder status. Even if a majority shareholder (owning 99.99% of shares) passes away, the company continues to operate until it is formally wound up. This ensures stability and continuity in business operations.

Example

"Dabur India Ltd." was incorporated in 1884 and has continued to exist and operate despite changes in ownership, management, or the death of shareholders. The company’s existence is not affected by such changes and continues until it is formally dissolved

Common Seal (If Applicable)

A common seal acts as the official signature of the company, used to authenticate important documents like contracts and deeds. While the Companies Act of 2013 has made it optional for private companies, some organisations still choose to adopt it for added authenticity and formal recognition.

Example

"Metro Pvt. Ltd." adopts a common seal as its official signature. When signing a property purchase agreement, the document is stamped with the company’s common seal, signifying its authenticity and approval by the board of directors. While optional, some companies still use it for formal documents

Decree Against Company & Corporate Veil

A company is generally not liable for an employee's wrongful acts unless they occur within the scope of employment. For liability to arise, the wrongful act must be directly linked to business operations rather than simply occurring during work hours.

The "corporate veil" protects shareholders from personal liability, but courts can lift this veil in cases of fraud or misconduct.

Example

An employee of "RapidMove Logistics Pvt. Ltd." causes damage to a client’s goods while making a delivery as part of his job. The client sues the company, not the employee personally. However, if the directors used the company to commit fraud, the court could hold them personally liable by lifting the corporate veil.

Company can Own Property

A company, as a separate legal entity, can own property in its name, and its assets are distinct from those of its members. Members do not have direct ownership over company assets but may have a right to claim remaining assets after the company is wound up.

Example

"TechHive Innovations Pvt. Ltd." purchases office equipment and furniture. These assets are owned by the company itself, not by any individual shareholder or director. If a shareholder leaves, the equipment still belongs to the company.

Company can be Trustee

A company can act as a trustee if its Memorandum of Association (MoA) permits it. The objects clause in the MoA defines the company's ability to function as a trustee. Companies often act as trustees in managing trusts, employee benefit funds, or asset management services, ensuring structured administration of assets.

Example

"SecureTrust Pvt. Ltd." is appointed as the trustee to manage a scholarship fund for underprivileged students. The company manages the fund’s assets and disburses scholarships according to the trust’s rules.

Capacity to Sue and Be Sued

As a separate legal entity, a company has the right to initiate legal proceedings and can also be sued in its own name. This ensures accountability and allows the company to protect its rights, enforce contracts, and address disputes independently of its owners or directors.

Example

"PureWater Solutions Pvt. Ltd." discovers that a supplier has delivered defective water filters. The company files a lawsuit against the supplier in its own name. Similarly, if the company fails to pay its rent, the landlord can sue the company directly.

Importance of Understanding Company Features

Understanding these features is crucial for ensuring legal compliance and making informed business decisions. It helps entrepreneurs, investors, and stakeholders navigate corporate operations effectively while minimising risks. Recognising the legal and financial implications of these features enables better decision-making in establishing and managing a company.

Frequently Asked Questions